Moers dating egyptian literary texts

The gloss p-t sky-F might make the reader understand that p alone is a word for ‘sky’ and that -t is a optional inflection or derivation morpheme. The feature feminine (F) is inherent to the whole word.

By choosing the ‘:’, we want to make clear that the feature ‘feminine’ is not solely present in the -t.).

(Also: If we treated the case of nj sḏm.n=f specially, we would hide the interesting semantic effect in Egyptian from the reader. ) – from the beginning to its end, explicitly enclosing its end.

Moers dating egyptian literary texts-56

If an action does Note that some of these forms are morphologically related to the respective ‘relative forms’ (see below).

Indeed, they are ‘uninflected relative forms’ in as far as they are ‘relative forms’ without number/gender endings.

This convention is due to the fact that in the case of personal pronouns the markedness for gender is not obligatory – so here gender comes last in the sequence – while with other nominal forms gender is often implicit, but number is optional and often marked by an additional morpheme – so here gender comes first. like gmi̯ and /_a_a_/ in strong 3rad verbs like sḏm.

A gloss gm-t find-INF would make the reader understand that gm alone is an unmarked stem for ‘find’ and that -t is the only feature that marks the infinitive (INF). The feature INF is distributed across the whole word, i.e. With the markup with ‘\’, the encoder makes it clear that the feature INF is not solely present in the .t.

What follows is a list of Earlier Egyptian (Middle Egyptian, Old Egyptian) grammatical forms and recommendations for their glossing.